Skip to main content

Divorce Dilemma - The Wedding Photos


There’s been only two times in my life where I felt like a rock star. Those times when everybody loves you, has all eyes on you and hangs on your every word. 

The first was in the 6th grade when I won the Charlotte Elementary School Stomper Pull-Off (click the link if you need a reminder) after my mother surprised me with a silver, snub-nosed Peterbilt Stomper 4X4 that yanked its entire weight in nails, screws, and washers on a make-shift sled. On that day, obviously not being able to see me in the next row over in Mrs. Heath’s class any other time, Tammy Moneypenny finally talked to me.  

The other was my wedding day. 

**

The culmination of nine-months preparation replete with two open bars, DJ, 5-course meal, and a hundred or so of our closest friends and family was the stage for the event. The last addition to these nuptials was a lone photographer whose duty it was to get the bride and groom in as many photos as possible without earning the label paparazzi. 

Little could our photographer have imagined that all of her just-one-mores, over-to-the-lefts, and scooch-in-a-littles would end up being part of the mine and her discussion a few years later. 

Walk into any married couples home and you’re quick to recognize a wedding photo as the staple of the home décor strategy. From the obnoxious 28x36 photo-shopped canvas hanging over the mantle, to the mundane dollar store binder on the end table, showcasing outdated wedding dresses, blue cumberbuns and hideous brides maid attire is a cultural tradition. 

But what happens to these memories should the bride and groom’s vows change from “I do” to “I don’t”?  

As the Jap and I were splitting up the martial assets, when it came time to discuss the wedding albums (notice the plural) I immediately took one for the team and cheerfully traded my portion for some drinking glasses and a paper-towel rack.  I was all for using the prints to start a bond-fire in the middle of the den as sacrifice, but she thought otherwise and, as far as I know, still has them all to this day. 

But why would anyone want them?

**

Much like the engagement ring whose original purpose has vanished, wouldn’t wedding photos seem to fall in that same category? Don’t they represent a time when feelings where far different, when emotions where love and respect instead of hate and contempt? If so, then what’s the reason behind keeping them after a divorce? 

There seems to be no rationale behind who gets them and who doesn’t. I know some divorces where the guy got them and others where the woman, who asked for the divorce, kept them. But either way it’s like continuing to wear your uniform from that McDonald’s job you had in high school. 

And what happens if you get married again. Do they get pulled out after one too many Cabernets for a trip down memory lane? How would the new partner feel to know that the love of their life has kept memories from time past that didn’t include them? Or is it a sort of long shot bet just in case someone decides to rekindle old flames? 

Does it change things if there were children? Would the kids want to keep pictures of their parents failed marriage? Are they going to put them on the end table in their apartment? 

As you might have guessed, I say they get trashed or put into a garage sale, maybe you’ll see yourself on the wall of a Cracker Barrel one morning over a plate of eggs and sausage. 

Originally published in 2010 

Popular posts from this blog

Dating In The Gap

My Aunt Lucille was the most sophisticated woman in our family. She was my grandmother’s youngest sister and her entire life seemed one big cosmopolitan adventure. The many years she spent in Atlanta coupled while remaining unencumbered by children only added to an already formidable metropolitan mystique. Her husband Uncle Kenny was known best for his Caribbean complexion, not because of his lineage but due to the countless hours spent each summer sunbathing in his back yard swaddled by the sounds of The Carpenters and Bee Gees emanating from his Sunbeam AM/FM radio. A visit to their home always felt like a vacation. Green PVC corrugated panels covered the roof of their suburban back patio from which the emerald hue gave off a tropical flavor that to a ten-year-old must surely have been what Miami or Bermuda was like.   Several years after my uncle’s death, of skin cancer coincidentally, Aunt Cile began spending time with another man. Rumor had it that she would have married ...

Marriage Isn't The Problem, The People In It Are

Anthropologists calculate the institution of marriage, or something you and I would recognize as such, to date back almost 5000 years. The earliest known marriage certificate, in this case a marriage contract, involving one woman and one man occurred in 2350 BC in Mesopotamia, or modern day Iraq. Over the ensuring centuries marriage evolved, influenced by culture and religion - especially Christianity -  to eventually become what you and I know it as today. Marriage was officially added as one of the seven sacraments of the Catholic Church in the 12th century forever placing it among the most sacred of undertakings. There’s no denying that matrimony between a man and woman is a cornerstone human civilization.  Yet with five millennia of historic precedent to support the idea of life long marriage between two people why is the noise about its necessity and future louder now than ever before? Is there any remaining rationale for marriage or are we just kidding ourselves? Has mar...